Intergranular Corrosion - A Comprehensive Guide

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • Intergranular Corrosion - A Comprehensive Guide
blog

Intergranular Corrosion - A Comprehensive Guide

January 28, 2025

Intergranular Corrosion (IGC) stands out as one of the most persistent challenges, since it silently compromises the integrity of structures and components. Unlike uniform corrosion, IGC targets the microscopic grain boundaries of metals, leaving the grain interiors intact but severely weakening the material's structural strength.

This phenomenon is not always visible to the naked eye, making it a silent yet destructive force in industries ranging from aerospace and nuclear energy to chemical processing and marine applications. Understanding IGC is crucial for engineers and industry professionals to ensure the longevity and reliability of critical components, especially in environments where safety and performance are important.

In this blog, we delve into the details of intergranular corrosion, exploring its causes, detection methods, and prevention strategies. Whether you’re a materials expert or simply curious about how advanced industries battle corrosion, this guide will equip you with valuable insights into managing this unique challenge.

Definition of Intergranular Corrosion (IGC)

Intergranular Corrosion (IGC) is a localized form of corrosion that occurs along the grain boundaries of metals and alloys, leaving the grain interiors largely unaffected. This type of corrosion weakens the material's structural integrity while preserving its external appearance, making it particularly challenging to detect visually. IGC is typically associated with specific metallurgical conditions and environmental factors that make the grain boundaries susceptible to preferential attack.

IGC poses significant risks to the structural and operational integrity of components used in critical industries such as chemical processing, nuclear power, aerospace, and oil and gas. Equipment like pipelines, pressure vessels, and heat exchangers, often exposed to corrosive environments, are vulnerable to IGC. Failure to recognize and mitigate IGC can result in catastrophic failures, economic losses, and safety hazards. Hence, understanding the mechanisms, causes, and prevention strategies of IGC is crucial for designing durable materials, extending the lifespan of components, and ensuring safety in industrial operations.

Mechanism of Intergranular Corrosion

Let’s have a detailed look at the stages of IGC. It proceeds in three stages as shown below:

Corrosion Process at Grain Boundaries

IGC arises from the chemical or electrochemical differences between the grain boundaries and the grain interiors of a metal or alloy. Grain boundaries often exhibit higher energy states and may act as preferential sites for impurity segregation or the precipitation of secondary phases. These regions become anodic relative to the cathodic grain interiors, forming microgalvanic cells under corrosive conditions. As a result, the grain boundaries corrode preferentially, compromising the material’s mechanical properties without significantly affecting its bulk appearance.

Sensitization and Precipitation of Chromium Carbides in Stainless Steels

Sensitization is a critical phenomenon responsible for IGC in stainless steels. It occurs when the material is exposed to temperatures in the range of 450°C to 850°C. At these temperatures, chromium reacts with carbon to form chromium-rich carbides (Cr??C?), which precipitate along the grain boundaries. This process depletes the surrounding regions of chromium, reducing the local chromium content below the critical threshold (approximately 12% by weight) required for corrosion resistance. The affected grain boundary regions become anodic relative to the grain interiors, leading to preferential attack when exposed to a corrosive environment.

Key stages in this process include:

  • Diffusion of Carbon and Chromium: During sensitization, carbon diffuses towards the grain boundaries, where it reacts with chromium to form carbides.
  • Precipitation of Chromium Carbides: The carbides precipitate at the grain boundaries, creating zones of chromium depletion.
  • Formation of Corrosion Cells: In the presence of an electrolyte, the chromium depleted zones become anodic, initiating localized corrosion.
    • Sensitization due to chromium carbide precipitation at grain boundaries.
    • Accelerated by improper welding practices or prolonged exposure to sensitization temperatures.
    • Precipitation of copper-rich phases or intermetallic compounds at grain boundaries.
    • Corrosion driven by galvanic differences between grain interiors and boundaries.
    • Susceptibility arises from the precipitation of phases such as ??, ??, or ?-phase along grain boundaries.
    • Typically observed in high-temperature applications like turbines and heat exchangers.
    • Selective attack of one phase (ferrite or austenite) due to differences in chemical composition and galvanic potential.

Metallurgical Changes Leading to IGC in Various Alloys

While the mechanism of IGC varies across different alloys, common factors include compositional segregation, precipitation of secondary phases, and thermal treatments that alter the microstructure. Key examples include:

  1. Austenitic Stainless Steels:
  2. Aluminum Alloys (2xxx and 7xxx series):
  3. Nickel-Based Alloys:
  4. Duplex Stainless Steels:

Causes of Intergranular Corrosion 

Intergranular corrosion arises from a combination of metallurgical and environmental factors that influence the susceptibility of a material's grain boundaries to attack. Understanding these causes is crucial for designing materials and processes to mitigate IGC in industrial applications.

Intergranular Corrosion

Thermal History and Sensitization Temperature Range

  • Sensitization occurs when a material is exposed to temperatures that promote the precipitation of deleterious phases, such as chromium carbides (Cr23C6), along grain boundaries.
  • For stainless steels, the critical temperature range for sensitization lies between 450°C and 850°C, where chromium reacts with carbon to form chromium carbides, depleting the adjacent grain boundary areas of chromium.

Impact of Thermal Cycles

  • Welding: The heat-affected zone (HAZ) in weldments often experiences thermal cycles within the sensitization range, making it highly vulnerable to IGC.
  • Heat Treatment: Improper solution annealing or slow cooling rates can lead to carbide precipitation and sensitization.
  • Service Temperatures: Prolonged exposure to sensitization temperatures during operation, such as in high-temperature environments in power plants or chemical reactors, can induce IGC.

Role of Alloy Composition

The chemical composition of the alloy significantly affects its susceptibility to intergranular corrosion.

Chromium

  • Chromium imparts corrosion resistance to stainless steels by forming a protective oxide layer (Cr2O3).
  • Precipitation of chromium carbides at grain boundaries depletes the surrounding regions of chromium below the critical concentration (approximately 12%), rendering the boundaries susceptible to corrosion.

Carbon

  • Carbon plays a critical role in sensitization by forming carbides with chromium. High-carbon steels are more prone to sensitization, whereas low-carbon grades (e.g., 304L, 316L) or stabilized grades (e.g., 321, 347) minimize the risk of carbide precipitation.

Aluminum

  • In aluminum alloys, intergranular corrosion is often associated with the segregation of copper or magnesium at grain boundaries, especially in alloys like the 2xxx and 7xxx series.

Other Elements

  • Titanium and Niobium: These elements can be added to stainless steels to form stable carbides (e.g., TiC, NbC), preventing chromium carbide precipitation.
  • Phosphorus and Sulfur: Impurities like phosphorus and sulfur can segregate at grain boundaries, increasing susceptibility to IGC.

Environmental Factors

The environment plays a significant role in accelerating IGC by interacting with the sensitized material.

Chlorides

  • Chloride ions are highly aggressive and can penetrate the protective oxide layer on metals, accelerating intergranular attack.
  • Common environments include marine atmospheres, desalination plants, and chemical process facilities.

Acidic Conditions

  • Acidic environments, such as those containing sulfuric or hydrochloric acid, promote localized corrosion at sensitized grain boundaries.
  • Lower pH values can significantly accelerate IGC rates.

Oxidizing Conditions

  • Oxidizing agents, such as nitric acid or high-temperature steam, can exacerbate IGC by promoting localized anodic dissolution at the grain boundaries.

Moisture and Contaminants

  • Atmospheric moisture combined with industrial pollutants (e.g., SOx or NOx gases) can create corrosive conditions conducive to IGC.

Types of Materials Affected by IGC

Various alloys are susceptible to intergranular corrosion, depending on their composition, processing history, and operating environment. Below is a discussion of materials commonly affected by IGC.

1. Stainless Steels

Austenitic Stainless Steels

  • Austenitic grades such as 304 and 316 are particularly susceptible to IGC when sensitized.
  • Low-carbon versions (304L, 316L) and stabilized grades (e.g., 321, 347) mitigate carbide formation and improve resistance.

Ferritic Stainless Steels

  • Ferritic stainless steels are less prone to sensitization due to their low carbon content but may experience IGC under severe environmental conditions or improper processing.

Duplex Stainless Steels

  • Duplex grades combine austenitic and ferritic phases, offering higher resistance to IGC, although improper heat treatment can still lead to susceptibility.

2. Aluminum Alloys

2xxx Series

  • These copper-containing alloys (e.g., 2024) are highly susceptible to IGC due to the segregation of copper-rich phases at grain boundaries.
  • Exposure to marine or industrial environments can exacerbate IGC in these alloys.

7xxx Series

  • Magnesium and zinc-rich aluminum alloys (e.g., 7075) are prone to IGC, especially when over-aged or exposed to corrosive environments.

3. Nickel-Based Alloys

  • Alloys like Inconel (e.g., 600, 625) and Hastelloy can experience IGC due to segregation of molybdenum or chromium at grain boundaries under specific conditions.
  • Nickel-based alloys used in high-temperature or chemical environments require careful processing to avoid IGC.

4. Other Metals

Titanium Alloys - Titanium alloys can exhibit intergranular attack in highly oxidizing environments or when contaminated with hydrogen.

Copper Alloys - Certain brass and bronze alloys can suffer from intergranular dezincification or selective attack in ammonia-rich environments.

Zirconium Alloys - Zirconium, often used in nuclear reactors, can experience IGC due to hydrogen absorption or exposure to high-temperature water.

Detection and Testing Methods for Intergranular Corrosion 

The detection and characterization of intergranular corrosion (IGC) are critical for assessing the integrity and reliability of materials used in various industries. Accurate identification involves standardized tests, advanced microscopy, and chemical analysis. This section provides a detailed overview of the methods employed to detect IGC, with an emphasis on industry standards and advanced techniques.

Intergranular Corrosion

ASTM A262 Practices

The ASTM A262 standard outlines the most widely used practices for detecting susceptibility to IGC in stainless steels. These practices include multiple test methods tailored to different material compositions and service conditions.

The Oxalic Acid Etch Test, also known as Practice A, provides a rapid screening method to evaluate the susceptibility of austenitic stainless steels to IGC. During this test, the specimen is electrolytically etched in an oxalic acid solution. The microstructure is examined under a microscope for specific patterns indicative of sensitization. Grain structures categorized as "step" indicate no sensitization, whereas "ditch" structures signify sensitization and susceptibility to IGC. This method is quick and inexpensive but qualitative in nature.

Practice B, known as the Streicher Test, is a destructive test that quantifies the corrosion rate of stainless steels when exposed to a boiling ferric sulfate-sulfuric acid solution. The test involves immersing the specimen in the solution for 24 to 120 hours and measuring the mass loss. The corrosion rate is calculated in terms of mils per year (mpy). This test is particularly effective for detecting chromium depletion at grain boundaries, making it suitable for materials prone to sensitization, such as those in the heat-affected zones of weldments.

The Huey Test, or Practice C, is designed to assess susceptibility to nitric acid attack, particularly in high-chromium stainless steels. The specimen is exposed to boiling 65% nitric acid in five consecutive 48-hour periods, with weight loss recorded after each period. This test provides quantitative data and is particularly reliable for evaluating high-chromium alloys used in corrosive environments.

Practice E, also known as the Strauss Test, tests a material's resistance to intergranular corrosion using a solution of copper sulphate and sulphuric acid. It is carried out in a controlled environment that mimics being exposed to specific corrosive substances. It involves Electrochemical Potentiokinetic Reactivation (EPR), a technique that evaluates sensitization levels in stainless steels using electrochemical methods. An electrolytic cell is used to obtain a potentiokinetic reactivation curve, and the degree of reactivation is correlated with the level of sensitization. This test is fast and quantitative but requires specialized equipment.

The Copper-Copper Sulfate-Sulfuric Acid Test, or Practice F, assesses the susceptibility of "as-received" stainless steel to intergranular assault. Because no previous heat treatment is used, the material's inherent resistance to corrosion is revealed.

Advanced Microscopy Techniques

To complement standardized tests, advanced microscopy techniques are used to analyze IGC at the microstructural level. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) provides high-resolution imaging of grain boundaries and corrosion features. It is particularly useful for examining grain boundary degradation and identifying intergranular attack morphologies. SEM allows direct visualization of corrosion damage on both polished and etched samples, although it requires skilled operators and is relatively expensive.

Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy is often coupled with SEM to perform elemental analysis at grain boundaries. This technique detects compositional changes, such as chromium depletion or the segregation of impurities like phosphorus and sulfur, which are critical for understanding the mechanisms of IGC. While EDX is non-destructive and provides detailed compositional data, its spatial resolution is limited when detecting ultra-thin features.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) offers atomic-scale insights into grain boundary composition and the precipitation of carbides such as Cr23C6. TEM is especially effective for analyzing sensitization mechanisms and characterizing fine-scale precipitation. However, the technique involves time-consuming sample preparation and high costs, making it less practical for routine analysis.

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) provides topographical imaging of corroded surfaces at the nanometer scale, allowing researchers to visualize grain boundary corrosion in three dimensions. This technique is useful for quantifying surface roughness caused by corrosion and is non-destructive, although it is limited to surface characterization.

Prevention Strategies for Intergranular Corrosion

Intergranular corrosion can significantly compromise the structural integrity of materials, leading to catastrophic failures in critical industrial applications. Preventing IGC requires a combination of material selection, thermal processing, fabrication techniques, and environmental control measures. This section provides an in-depth discussion of these strategies and their roles in mitigating IGC risks.

1. Alloy Selection

The composition of the alloy plays a pivotal role in determining its susceptibility to IGC. One of the primary mechanisms for IGC in stainless steels is the precipitation of chromium carbides at grain boundaries during sensitization. To counteract this, selecting alloys with specific properties is essential.

Low-Carbon Grades

Low-carbon stainless steels, such as 304L and 316L, are specifically designed to minimize carbide precipitation. The "L" designation indicates a maximum carbon content of 0.03%, which significantly reduces the formation of chromium carbides at grain boundaries, even when exposed to sensitization temperatures. These grades are particularly effective for applications involving welding or prolonged exposure to moderate temperatures.

Stabilized Grades

Stabilized grades, such as 321 (stabilized with titanium) and 347 (stabilized with niobium), are engineered to prevent sensitization by binding carbon with strong carbide-forming elements. These elements preferentially form stable carbides, such as titanium carbide (TiC) or niobium carbide (NbC), instead of chromium carbides. This ensures that the chromium content remains sufficient to maintain the protective oxide layer, even under thermal cycling conditions.

Alloying Elements

The addition of elements like molybdenum, nickel, and nitrogen can enhance the resistance of stainless steels and nickel-based alloys to IGC. For example, nickel increases the stability of the austenitic phase, while molybdenum improves resistance to localized corrosion in chloride-containing environments. Selecting the appropriate alloy composition based on the service environment is crucial for long-term performance.

2. Proper Heat Treatment and Solution Annealing

Thermal treatment processes, particularly solution annealing, are critical for eliminating sensitization and reducing the risk of IGC. Proper heat treatment ensures a uniform microstructure and prevents the formation of deleterious phases at grain boundaries.

Solution Annealing

Solution annealing involves heating the material to a temperature range where carbides dissolve back into the matrix (typically between 1000°C and 1100°C for austenitic stainless steels), followed by rapid quenching. The rapid cooling prevents the re-precipitation of carbides, restoring the alloy's corrosion resistance.

Stress Relief

Post-fabrication stress relief heat treatments can also mitigate IGC by reducing residual stresses that may enhance localized corrosion at grain boundaries. This is particularly important for components subjected to mechanical deformation or welding.

Thermal Stability

Alloys exposed to high temperatures during service should be selected or treated to maintain thermal stability. Stabilized grades or low-carbon variants are particularly useful in this regard.

3. Welding Techniques that Minimize Sensitization

Welding is a common fabrication process in industrial applications, but it is also a significant contributor to sensitization in stainless steels and other alloys. The heat-affected zone (HAZ) in welds often experiences thermal cycles within the sensitization temperature range (450°C to 850°C), making it vulnerable to IGC. Adopting appropriate welding practices can effectively minimize this risk.

Low-Heat Input Welding

Using welding techniques that minimize heat input, such as Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) or Laser Welding, can reduce the size of the HAZ and limit the time spent at sensitization temperatures. This approach is particularly effective for thin sections and precision welding applications.

Preheating and Post-Weld Heat Treatment

Preheating before welding and performing post-weld heat treatments can mitigate residual stresses and homogenize the microstructure. Post-weld solution annealing is especially effective for restoring corrosion resistance in sensitized materials.

Filler Material Selection

The choice of filler material is crucial for weld integrity and corrosion resistance. Using low-carbon or stabilized filler materials ensures that the welded joints remain resistant to sensitization. For instance, matching a stabilized base metal (e.g., 321) with a stabilized filler metal (e.g., E347 electrode) ensures long-term resistance to IGC.

Weld Design and Geometry

Design considerations, such as avoiding sharp corners or crevices and ensuring proper joint fit-up, can also minimize areas prone to localized corrosion. Proper cleaning of the weld area to remove contaminants, such as grease or oxides, further reduces corrosion risks.

4. Environmental Control Measures 

Environmental factors, such as exposure to chlorides, acids, and oxidizing agents, significantly influence the onset and progression of IGC. Effective environmental control can minimize the risk of corrosion in susceptible materials.

Minimizing Exposure to Corrosive Agents

One of the simplest ways to mitigate IGC is by controlling exposure to aggressive environments. For instance, reducing the chloride content in cooling water or using deionized water in sensitive processes can significantly reduce the likelihood of localized attack.

Protective Coatings and Inhibitors

Applying protective coatings, such as epoxy or polymer-based layers, provides a physical barrier between the material and the environment. Additionally, the use of corrosion inhibitors, such as nitrites or phosphates, can further protect against IGC in aqueous environments.

Controlled Operating Conditions

Maintaining controlled operating conditions, such as stable pH and temperature levels, is essential for preventing IGC. Avoiding prolonged exposure to sensitization temperatures, particularly in heat exchangers or boilers, can minimize the risk of grain boundary attack.

Cathodic Protection

In some cases, cathodic protection can be employed to mitigate IGC. This technique involves applying an external electrical current to reduce the material's electrochemical potential, thereby preventing localized corrosion at grain boundaries.

Conclusion

Intergranular corrosion (IGC) is a critical issue in industrial applications, arising from the localized attack at grain boundaries due to sensitization and environmental factors. Addressing this challenge requires a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the implementation of effective prevention strategies.

Key preventive measures include selecting appropriate alloys, such as low-carbon grades (e.g., 304L, 316L) and stabilized grades (e.g., 321, 347), which reduce the risk of chromium carbide precipitation. Proper heat treatment, particularly solution annealing, plays a vital role in eliminating sensitization by dissolving carbides and restoring material integrity. Optimized welding techniques, such as low-heat input welding and post-weld heat treatments, further minimize the risk of IGC in welded structures.